|
Post by Ten on Mar 15, 2009 15:00:25 GMT -5
Shocking, isn't it?
Anyway, why is it that people want (somewhat) even gender ratios? Besides wanting everyone to have a fair chance at a mate. Despie hook-up role plays don't count.
|
|
|
Post by pteriforever on Mar 15, 2009 16:10:30 GMT -5
I, for one, reckon that bans should only get added if the ratio is worse than 3:5.
Crow probably thinks it would be more natural and traditional, but you WOULD have natural fluctuation of up to about 3:5 in real life. I dunno really.
|
|
|
Post by Ten on Mar 15, 2009 17:41:26 GMT -5
"Crow probably thinks it would be more natural and traditional," --x
Natural I understand, as it's supposed to be a 50% chance that a baby/kit will turn out to be either gender. But traditional? Do you mean the traditions of the Warriors books, or the traditions of role play?
|
|
|
Post by pteriforever on Mar 15, 2009 17:51:57 GMT -5
of role play in general.
|
|
|
Post by Ten on Mar 15, 2009 18:50:47 GMT -5
"of role play in general." --x
So you're saying you think Crow's doing something just because a lot of other people do?
|
|
|
Post by tiddler on Mar 15, 2009 19:08:02 GMT -5
Because it's more natural? In real life there isn't more male cats then female, or vice versa. Apart from, like, a 0.0001%-esque percentage.
|
|
|
Post by pteriforever on Mar 15, 2009 19:19:57 GMT -5
That's what I've been trying to explain. Worldwide, only 0.1% more people are female than male, but here, it's huge due to smaller population.
|
|